| Index » I Why Civics » 3. How Democracy & Citizenship Evolved |
| Documents | Pictures | Biographies | Quotations | Activities | Web Search | Glossary |
| « | 3. How Democracy & Citizenship Evolved | » |
The Roots and Origins of GovernmentGovernment - defined as an organized system of decision-making - has existed for hundreds of centuries. When humans first banded together into communities for protection, to hunt and survive, they devised simple and often arbitrary ways to govern their behaviour.[Neolithic Cave Painting of a Hunt] Humans developed systems and traditions so that they could make basic decisions about survival - how to allocate scarce resources, what was the best way to hunt, where they should camp, how they should protect themselves, where they should move and how they should deal with their neighbours. In prehistoric societies, might did indeed make right. The physically strongest simply took power. When a leader was challenged, he had to overcome and vanquish his competitor. If he failed to do so, he lost his power - and usually his life. Life was violent, chaotic and very brief. [Neolithic Cave Painting of Warfare] Over the centuries, as prehistoric people developed their physical skills and began to rely more on brains than brawn, society advanced. Humans harnessed fire. They domesticated the wild dog and the reindeer. They refined powerful new tools, such as the bow and arrow and spear thrower. They began to organize more elaborate hunting and food gathering strategies. The human's food supply, however, was constantly on the move. To survive, humans were nomadic - they had to follow the herds or starve. The first major human revolution was in agriculture. It occurred about 10,000 BCE, when certain groups, probably in the middle east, developed a more constant and stable food supply. This was based on higher yielding grains which the humans stored for long periods of time in clay pots. The revolution was also based on the invention of ways of keeping water fresh and safe to drink through the brewing of a mild beer. It also included domesticating animals like goats, pigs and chickens. Humans changed from food gathers to food producers. Farming allowed early humans to settle in an area for a prolonged period of time. In addition, once agrarian methods were improved, farmers could produce a surplus, which in turn allowed for the specialization of labour. Not everyone in the society had to be engaged in producing food. Some people were involved in other work. Artisans, builders, religious figures, thinkers and writers, as well as political officers and tax collectors, emerged to serve the changing needs of civilized humanity. (The word civilized comes from the Latin "civis" - meaning a resident of a town, and the earlier Sanskrit "sivá-s" - trusted or worthy.)
[Bronze Mask of King Sargon of Sumer] The first real governments emerged in about 7,000 BCE, with human settlement. These early forms of governments were organized systems of making decisions to allocate resources, to wage war and make peace, to establish rules of behaviour. They also decided how to exercise the power of the rulers and to provide for their temples of religion. As societies increased in size and complexity, they had to find more orderly ways to make community decisions. Some civilizations relied on a single, powerful warlord. Others chose some form of governing council. Some had hereditary rulers who wanted to perpetuate their dynasties. But all of them had to address a common concern - what was the best method of making decisions within that society? Other important questions emerged: Who would have power? How would it be exercised? What rights would be accorded to minorities? Who would get what? For the earliest centuries, human existence - and remember that human history compared with the history of the world is like a flat dime seen against the CN Tower - was relatively simple. Survival was paramount. Groupings of people were small. Most people knew one another, or were related to them. Because they were not literate, there was no need for written rules and laws. Everyone understood the unwritten customs, rules, and mores. If they did not, they would suffer the consequences. [Recreation of Village of Çatal Hüyük, Turkey, c. 6,500-5,650 BCE; population about 5500; houses were entered through a hole in the roof] As the human population grew, wandering bands settled in villages. Villages became towns. In about 4000 BCE, in present-day Iraq and Syria, towns grew into cities. [Ruins of the City of Perseopolis] As more people settled in smaller areas, the chances of conflict grew. People disagreed about trade, land, property, inheritance, religion, labour and behaviour. Some formal method of preventing and resolving conflict had to be devised. They needed a permanent code of laws, otherwise life would be far too chaotic and dangerous. To ensure that everyone knew the laws - ignorance of the law could not be accepted as an excuse - they had to be recorded. [Hammurabi Stele, Musée du Louvre] Hammurabi, the ruler of ancient Babylon from 1792 to 1750 BCE, created one of the earliest known written code of laws. Called Hammurabi's Code, the 282 laws were carved into a rock column using a new system of writing called cuneiform. His legal system addressed everyday facets of life, such as wages, interest rates, theft, marriage, divorce, adoption, and military duty. [Shamash Giving the Law, detail of gypsum version of Hammurabi Stele] The Governing of Ancient EgyptFew, if any, civilizations, inspire such awe as ancient Egypt. Herodotus, the ancient Greek historian, claimed that Egypt "has more wonders in it than any country in the world and more works that are beyond description than anywhere else." Ancient Egypt has given us many riddles and mysteries : King Tut, mummification, the construction of the pyramids, tales of untold riches, mystifying curses, hieroglyphic writing, and the Book of the Dead. For over three thousand years, Egyptian civilization provided the stability and order for people to achieve and create unsurpassed monuments.[Pyramids of Gizeh] Before the Frenchman Jean Champollion deciphered the Rosetta Stone, in the early nineteenth century, most of what was known about Egyptian civilization came from studying unwritten records such as temples, tomb paintings, and pyramids. Discovered in 1799 by French soldiers in Egypt, the Rosetta Stone held the key to understanding Egyptian civilization. Champollian, after painstaking effort, cracked the code in 1822 by deciphering the combination of Egyptian hieroglyphic, demotic, and Greek writing. Geography had a major impact on the location of this civilization. The fortunes - indeed the creation - of Egyptian society depended on the annual flooding of the Nile River. The receding flood waters left behind rich alluvial soil, which allowed the region to be a highly productive agricultural area. The people could depend on a regular food supply. The Nile Delta, the area where the river empties into the Mediterranean Sea, became the largest area of fertile land and the centre for most of Egypt's greatest achievements. Rivers such as the Tigris and the Euphrates also flooded, but did so unpredictably and often violently. It was the regularity and gentle nature of the Nile's flooding that permitted the Egyptians to plan, not only their planting and harvesting, but their larger society as well. [The Nile Delta From Space] About 3100 BCE, King Menes created one of the world's great civilizations by uniting the separate kingdoms of Upper and Lower Egypt by conquering the Lower Kingdom. We divide the history of ancient Egypt into three distinct periods, each dominated by its own accomplishment: the Old Kingdom (from 2686 BCE to 2150 BCE) was characterized by the age of the great pharaohs and their pyramids; the Middle Kingdom (from about 2050 BCE to 1700 BCE) witnessed major expansion of the boundaries of the civilization; and the New Kingdom (from about 1550 BCE to 1070 BCE) was called the "Golden Age", an era marked by glorious artistic and cultural achievements. In order to provide the stability they needed for their civilization to thrive and progress, the Egyptians devised a workable political system. Politics and religion were united into one. At the core of their political life was the concept of the god-king. Throughout the entire existence of Egyptian civilization, the pharaoh was seen as the earthly embodiment of the god Horus, the son of Amon-Re. The pharaoh was Horus' representative on earth and as such was infallible and perfect. He could not be challenged or criticized, or deposed. His authority was unassailable. The pharaoh was both a religious and political figure and his power in one dimension increased his power in the other. Ruling by divine right provided considerable stability and order to Egyptian civilization. Since the pharoah's word was divinely inspired, there were few challengers to his dominance.
Pharoah Tutankhamon ["In his hands the king grasps scroll-like objects thought to be containers for the documents by which the gods affirmed the monarch's right to divine rule"; c1330 BCE; © Oriental Institute, University of Chicago] There was, however, a restriction on the pharaoh's absolute power. All expected him to rule according to the dictates of Ma'at, the goddess of balance and harmony in the universe. He could not rule arbitrarily or try to radically alter society. The pharaoh had to remain faithful to the precedents established by his predecessors as well as the dictates of Ma'at. The dictatorships of ancient Egypt were closer to modern monarchies than current dictatorships in the matter of succession. Modern dictatorships often experience difficulties in the transition of power. Egyptian civilization, however, avoided the problem by setting in place an orderly pattern of succession. The pharaoh passed the throne on to the Principal Queen, sometimes known as the Great Royal Wife. Normally, she was the eldest daughter of the previous pharaoh, and the sister of the current king. In the absence of a son born to the Principal Queen, the throne passed to the son of a secondary wife, who then would legitimize his rule by marrying the Great Royal Daughter. She was the daughter of the pharaoh and the Principal Queen, or in the absence of a daughter, the Principal Queen herself (i.e. the stepmother of the incoming pharaoh). [The Pyramid of Power in Egypt] The pharaoh was omni-potent. He owned all land, wealth, and possessions, including the gold from the mines in Upper Egypt. Anything that anyone else owned was deemed to be held through the generosity of the pharaoh. The pharaoh entrusted the actual administering of government to a phalanx of civil servants. They oversaw everything from pyramid building to the collection and spending of taxes. Top-ranking and long-serving officials were rewarded by the pharaoh with land and other gifts. They often became very wealthy. Among the most important and powerful government officials were the scribes, the only literate individuals in society. They recorded the achievements of the pharaoh and his relations with foreign dynasties. They also kept meticulous financial records. Often a scribe was appointed vizier or prime minister. Viziers were the real, day-to-day power behind the political system. They set priorities, advised the pharoah, made important decisions on his behalf, and served as heads of the judiciary. Underneath the vizier was an army of government officials who looked after all facets of managing a sprawling empire. The government officials collected taxes, conducted trade, supervised construction, oversaw all facets of agriculture, provided health care, and managed the legal system. Resource: The Precepts of the Prefect, the Lord Ptah-Hotep, c. 2200 BCE. As early as the Old Kingdom, Egypt was a highly complex, bureaucratic state. It had a highly centralized administration that gave the people social stability, order, and prosperity. The mass of the people, however enjoyed few rights. The many slaves - most descended from people brought back to Egypt as prisoners of war - had no rights at all. The legal system, compared to other civilizations of that time, was relatively fair and equitable. There was no codified law, but the legal system rested on precedent (rulings in previous similar cases). Laws were applied equally, and punishments were swift and harsh. Minor crimes brought 100 lashes; sexual assault resulted in castration; corrupt government officials had hands amputated; betraying military secrets resulted in the perpetrator's tongue being cut out. Egyptian civilization long before both the Greek and Roman empires pioneered and developed standards for governing society. They understood the need for stability and order for progress to occur. They evolved a complex, highly efficient system that addressed the needs of the society. Power was centralized in the pharaoh, who wielded absolute dominance, but did so by balancing the principles of precedent and equilibrium. The transition of power, the administration of justice, and the providing of essential services all contributed to the stability and order that made the greatness of ancient Egypt. [Painted Jar from Upper Egypt, with Barges and Ostriches, c3600 BCE; © Oriental Institute, University of Chicago] |
Ancient Athens: The Birthplace of Democracy![]() [Silver Athenian tetradrachm coin c.425 BCE. The owl was associated with Athena, goddess of wisdom.] Twenty-five centuries ago Athens became the birthplace of democracy. In fact, the word "democracy" comes from the Greek - "demos" meaning people and "kratos" meaning power. Democracy, the political system in which citizens are able to exercise power in making the major decisions affecting their lives, was born in Greece during an era that was one of the high points of human civilization. This period of Greek history, known as the "golden age", was made great by philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle, playwrights such as Aeschylus and Sophocles, architectural achievements such as the Parthenon, and by leaders such as Pericles.
[Bust of Aristotle] Ancient Greece (700 to 350 BCE) was divided into political and administrative units called city-states. These were similar to fiefdoms and principalities that existed in other areas of the world. A single ruler or a small group, usually supported by the military, governed most of the Greek city-states. The pre-eminent example of this type of government was the city-state of Sparta. It was heavily militaristic with very few, if any, rights for its people. In Athens, another model evolved, where the people participated directly in the decision-making structure of the state. For ancient Greeks, the center of life was the "polis." The "polis" meant both city and state, and it was where a citizen owed his loyalty. Our word "politics," referring to public affairs of the city, comes from that early Greek term. (The term "government" also comes from Greek. The word "kybernan" which was borrowed from nautical jargon meant to steer or guide a ship.) The "polis" was the heart, the cradle of democracy. It was the place where the idea of democracy - the concept of people governing themselves - first began. Citizenship in ancient Athens was considered both a right and a responsibility. It was granted only to native-born adult men. Citizenship was denied to women, the young, slaves, servants, and immigrants. All citizens were not simply encouraged to participate in the affairs of the city- it was expected and demanded. What emerged was a unique form of democracy- direct rule by citizens. It was a direct democracy because it was small enough that all adult male citizens could gather at a outdoor assembly called the Pnyx. [Pynx Site Today] As W.S Davis described it,
"The Pnyx is an open space of ground due west from the Acropolis. It originally sloped gently away towards the northeast, but a massive retaining wall had been built around it, in an irregular semicircle, and the space within filled with solidly packed earth sloping inwards, making a kind of open air auditorium. It is a huge place, 394 feet long, and 213 feet at the widest. The earthen slope is entirely devoid of seats; everybody casts himself down sprawling or on his haunches, perhaps with an old himation under him. Directly before the sitters runs a long ledge hewn out of the rock, forming, as it were, the "stage" side of the theater. Here the rock has been cut away, so as to leave a sizable stone pulpit standing forth, with a small flight of steps on each side. This is the "Bema," the orator's stand, whence speak the "demagogues,"[*] the molders of Athenian public opinion. In front of the Bema there is a small portable altar for the indispensable sacrifices. In the rear of the Bema are a few planks laid upon the rock. Here will sit the fifty "Pryantes" in charge of the meeting. There is a handsome chair for the presiding officer upon the Bema itself. These are all the furnishings of the structure wherein Athens makes peace and war, and orders her whole civil and foreign policy. The Hellenic azure is the only roof above her [sovereign] law makers. To the right, as the orators stand on the Bema, they can point toward the Acropolis and its glittering temples; to the left towards the Peiržus, and the blue sea with the inevitable memories of glorious Salamis [a Greek naval victory]. Surely it will be easy to fire all hearts with patriotism! Formerly a place of worship in a natural amphitheatre, the Pnyx became a public meeting place after the Athenians abolished their monarchy. There, meeting as the "ecclesia" or popular assembly, they would discuss, debate, and vote on the issues of the day. This could involve the punishment that should be accorded a criminal, something minor such as the location of a proposed road, or something much weightier such as the decision to go to war. Famous orators such as Pericles, Themistocles and Demosthenes all spoke here. And it was here that concepts such as freedom of speech and the rights of man were first proclaimed. [Bust of Pericles] Resource: The Ecclesia of Athens. Normally, the more significant the issue, the greater percentage of the city's 40 000 citizens would attend. Rarely more than ten to fifteen percent were present, but a quorum of at least 5,000 male Athenians was necessary to enact laws. A simply majority vote decided every issue. This system of majority rule grew out of the twin beliefs that the heart of life was the polis and the essence of the polis was the citizen. Every citizen was a vital member of an organic community. Citizens were expected to be informed and active in order for the city to progress. They enjoyed rights including certain freedoms and the right to influence decisions. At the same time as they enjoyed the rights of citizenship, Athenian citizens had to fulfill the responsibilities of citizenship. They had to obey all the laws, be informed about issues, and discuss and vote on those issues. Nevertheless, only a small fraction of eligible voters attended the ecclesia on most occasions. Civic duty was not always popular, and sometimes Athenians had to be pushed to vote. On a slow day the Scythian or slave police were ordered to gather up hesitant or recalcitrant voters with ropes dipped in red paint and herd them to the Pnyx. Lazy citizens were scorned. In fact, our term "idiot" comes from old Greek. In ancient Athens an idiot was someone who concentrated solely on his own affairs ( "id" meaning self) and took no part in community life. To the Greeks, this lack of interest in public affairs was a certain sign of "idiocy." Civic Virtue It was hardly surprising that the great philosophers, Plato and Aristotle, considered civic virtue to be one of the highest and most important of all virtues. They saw that the progress and health of the polis depended on its citizens getting actively involved. Citizens shared in the glory that was Greece, because they played a part in its development. Pericles, a staunch supporter of the Athenian way of life, in his "Funeral Oration" most eloquently captured the sense of civic virtue and responsibility in ancient Athens. . Elected as "strategegos" (or military commander) during a war with the detested city-state of Sparta, Pericles put into words how the people felt about their native polis. While Sparta was a military state with no public participation in decision-making, Athens was the model of democracy. In his Funeral Oration, Pericles tried to give solace to the relatives and friends of those brave Athenians who had died trying to preserve the Athenian way of life. He tried to show that they had not died in vain, but rather, had given their lives to defend and preserve something very valuable and admired. The words of Pericles still resonate in our ears. They provided a model for the stirring words of Abraham Lincoln's "Gettysburg Address". To this day, the "Funeral Oration" is regarded as the classic statement of democratic values and beliefs. Recorded by "the father of history," Thucydides, the words echo through the ages. "Our constitution is called a democracy because power is in the hands not of a minority but of the whole people. When it is a question of settling private disputes, everyone is equal before the law; when it is a question of putting one person before another in positions of public responsibility, what counts is not membership of a particular class, but the actual ability the man possesses.... No one, so long as he has it in him to be of service to the state, is kept in political obscurity because of poverty.... Each individual is interested not only in his own affairs but in the affairs of the state as well.... We do not say that a man who takes no interest in politics is a man who minds his own business; we say that he has no business here at all...." Resource: Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War (431 BCE). Government of the Roman Empire: System & StructureRome was the third great civilization of ancient times. At the same time as democracy was thriving in Athens and the Egyptian empire was flourishing, city-states on the Italian peninsula were developing. Rome became one of the greatest empires the world has ever seen. It was the sheer size of that empire that led to the most significant Roman contribution to government. The Romans developed a highly efficient, intricately structured bureaucracy to administer their far-flung empire.
[Roman Coin of the Caesars] Before Rome would get to the same point as ancient Greece, the Roman Empire had to go through many internal divisions, conflicts, and civil wars. The citizens of Rome fought long and hard to win the right to participate in their own government. They never, however, achieved the degree of involvement that the Athenians won. During its first two centuries the Roman Empire functioned through a system of kings. In 509 BCE, the Romans overthrew the Etruscan king and established a republic (a state without an hereditary monarch). The Roman Republic, in five centuries, grew from a small city-state to a major world power. In the early period, Roman government and society was dominated by a group of wealthy landowners, called patricians. The vast majority of the people, the plebeians, were regarded as citizens and could own land, but they could not hold political office or marry into patrician families. Slaves, mostly acquired through foreign conquest - though some plebeians were enslaved for debt, were not classified as citizens and were the lowest rung of the ladder. Patricians controlled the early government of Rome through the Senate. It was comprised of three hundred patricians who served for life. Every year the Senate selected two consuls (officials) from the patrician class to administer the laws of Rome. In addition, the consuls directed the government and commanded the army. Each consul had identical power and each held a veto over any action undertaken by the other. A popular assembly, elected by the plebeians, had to consent to the Senate's choices. In the early days of the Empire, however, the assembly held little power and did not challenge the Senate. After serving his term the consul automatically became a member of the Senate. In times of crisis, the position of consul was replaced by a dictator who held absolute power, but for only six months. The plebeians, in reality, had little real power and few rights. Upset with this situation, in 494 BCE, they staged a civic protest. They refused to work until such time as real reforms were made to the political system. They also vowed that until their demands for more political rights and power were met, they would leave Rome. Their strategy worked - they forced the patricians to capitulate. Over the next several centuries the plebeians won greater rights, including the all-important power to have input into the laws under which they lived. Despite their victory, the real power still resided in the patrician-controlled Senate. It was the focal point of government. Two different assemblies; the Assembly of Centuries and the Assembly of Tribes replaced the popular assembly. The Assembly of Centuries was comprised of the entire Roman army, both patricians and plebeians. It passed laws and elected the consuls, who had formerly been chosen by the Senate. It appointed other officials, including the praetors, or judges, who ruled in all legal matters; and censors, who registered the population for purposes of taxation and voting. The Assembly of Tribes, composed of plebeians, elected ten tribunes to represent their interests.
Resource: The Twelve Tables of Roman Law (450 BCE). The tablets were destroyed in the sack of Rome by the Gauls in 390BC, but a number of the laws shown here are known through references in later Latin literature. In 451 BCE ten magistrates, called decemvirs, wrote Rome's first written law code, basing it on existing oral law. The laws were inscribed on tablets of bronze, which were posted in the Roman Forum for all to see and know. Written and publicized laws led to significant progress against arbitrary treatment. The Laws, however, kept in place the strict separation between patrician and plebeian. Over the next two centuries, the plebeians again made important progress in gaining more rights. The ban on marriage between patricians and plebeians was lifted. So too was enslavement for debt. The Assembly of Tribes gained the right to pass laws, first with Senate approval and later without it. By 367 BCE, one of the two consuls was a plebeian. Eventually, plebeians won the right to hold political office, even the right to sit in the Senate. Even with all these reforms, however, there was not equality among citizens. By the third century BCE, a new class of rich plebeians who had married into old patrician families dominated the government. The bulk of their wealth came from the many Roman wars of conquest. If one of the major developments in the evolution of the Roman government was the growing power of the plebeians, the other resulted from wars of expansion. The Romans called the Mediterranean Sea "Mare Nostrum" (Our Sea) because they controlled all the lands that bordered it. By 120 CE, the Roman Empire included all of present-day Portugal, Spain, France, Switzerland, Belgium, Bosnia, and Turkey. With such great expansion, the Romans had to develop a system for efficiently managing and ruling their far-flung area. An immense system of roads and aqueducts, and a phalanx of civil servants was essential to enforce "Pax Romana" (the Roman Peace) in the far reaches of the Empire. [Bust of Julius Caesar] As the Roman Empire acquired new territory and people, it granted the rights of citizenship to many male residents of the conquered lands. In fact, the term "citizen" comes from Latin, the language of the Roman Empire. A "civis" was any individual who lived in territory controlled by the Empire. Citizenship was highly valued. As with ancient Athens, citizenship within the Roman Empire was never awarded to women, slaves, servants, or children. Our term "city" also derives from "civis" in that the Romans, like the Athenians who preceded them, believed that only city inhabitants could effectively participate in public decision-making. [Augustus Caesar] The Roman Empire eventually came full circle. It started with rule by dictators, and although the Republic lasted for centuries, it ended with a dictator. After considerable internal conflict through the First Triumvirate (Caesar, Pompey, and Crassius), Caesar's dictatorship, the Second Triumvirate (Caesar's son- Octavian, Mark Anthony, and Marcus Lepidus), and the dictatorship of Augustus, the Roman Empire was in a downward spiral. There was massive corruption among the ruling elites, crippling discord at the top, and the people demanded radical changes. The rulers attempted to appease them with "bread and circuses." The Empire was simply too vast to administer effectively. [Ruins of the Coloseum of Rome] In its centuries of existence, however, the Roman Empire bequeathed a major legacy to the history of government and citizenship - bureaucratic efficiency, legal reforms, and citizenship rights. [Bust of Julius Caesar] |
| Index » I Why Civics » 3. How Democracy & Citizenship Evolved |
| Documents | Pictures | Biographies | Quotations | Activities | Web Search | Glossary |
| « | 3. How Democracy & Citizenship Evolved | » |
![]()